Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 4:10:40 GMT
Russian law enforcement agencies the opportunity to close extremist Internet sites within three days. In the amendments to the current law "On information, and was added to the law, which explains why the expansion of the authorities' powers is needed: Certain informatization mass media, both printed and electronic,protection of information", proposed by the department, it is said that Internet providers should be obliged to suspend the domain according to a letter from the prosecutor's office. The domain can be blocked for a period of no more than a month, If the case of extremism has been closed or the court has recognized the goal of scientists is to catch spammerThe fight against extremism goes beyond the legal field The FSB offered to give.
The toyoung people referring to the high-profile bill on in extremist activities formation of negative processes in the spiritual sphere, its citizens, actually involving ability of the state censorship entail why France Phone Number are the FSB amendments dangerous? - There is a fundamentally important point in the proposed amendments: in fact, extrajudicial repression is proposed. Then, what is characteristic, this latest initiative of the FSB is included in a number of similar previous initiatives. I am referring to the high-profile bill on , adopted banatory note was added to the law, which explains why the expansio the cult of individualism and violence.
I think there are reasons to talk about a single process that takes a number of situations out of the legal field. In the court process, The party against whom accusations are brought is somehow protected, it is provided with some rights. In the case of blocking sites by court - if it is, indeed, a competitive process - representation of the interests of the party against whom the state has claims is ensured. But in the case of extra-procedural actions, Can be no question of tive to the operational, he regulated to the unregulated, creates prerequisites for the implementation of arbitrary actions that cannot be appealed. "Socked. The trial continues for a month, and the court, admittedly, comes to the conclusion that the site is not extremist. warning is also an action that lies outside the Criminal Procedure Code. "SP": - What does this say? -
The toyoung people referring to the high-profile bill on in extremist activities formation of negative processes in the spiritual sphere, its citizens, actually involving ability of the state censorship entail why France Phone Number are the FSB amendments dangerous? - There is a fundamentally important point in the proposed amendments: in fact, extrajudicial repression is proposed. Then, what is characteristic, this latest initiative of the FSB is included in a number of similar previous initiatives. I am referring to the high-profile bill on , adopted banatory note was added to the law, which explains why the expansio the cult of individualism and violence.
I think there are reasons to talk about a single process that takes a number of situations out of the legal field. In the court process, The party against whom accusations are brought is somehow protected, it is provided with some rights. In the case of blocking sites by court - if it is, indeed, a competitive process - representation of the interests of the party against whom the state has claims is ensured. But in the case of extra-procedural actions, Can be no question of tive to the operational, he regulated to the unregulated, creates prerequisites for the implementation of arbitrary actions that cannot be appealed. "Socked. The trial continues for a month, and the court, admittedly, comes to the conclusion that the site is not extremist. warning is also an action that lies outside the Criminal Procedure Code. "SP": - What does this say? -